<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FTC Drop an A-Bomb on Internet Affiliates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/</link>
	<description>Affiliate training guides, affiliate articles, affiliate podcasts, affiliate software, affiliate strategies, affiliate tools, and more, to help you make more money from affiliate programs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 10:01:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Misato Katsuragi</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator>Misato Katsuragi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatetraining.com/?p=3099#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,
I don&#039;t share the same opinion as a lot of these doomsayers say, but then again, I don&#039;t think this is something that isn&#039;t going to cause a lot of collateral damage in the form of some honest affiliate marketers being trounced right along with the so called &#039;vagabonds&#039;, as you put it.

First off, the law isn&#039;t as explicit as it needs to be.  Also, the fine is not enough to cause the big time scam artists to change any of their marketing tactics.  It will cost many of them a lot more money in lost sales than the $11,000 fine will, if they start marketing honestly all of a sudden.  This is not to condone dishonest marketing, but we all know it is far easier to make a killing if you don&#039;t have pesky little things like morals, honor and ethics standing in the way.

On the flip side, the $11,000 fine will usually be more than enough to severly cripple, or put out of business altogether, the honest ma and pa affiliate marketers.  

As a result, what you will be left with is a new playground for the affiliate scammers, created specially for them by the FTC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,<br />
I don&#8217;t share the same opinion as a lot of these doomsayers say, but then again, I don&#8217;t think this is something that isn&#8217;t going to cause a lot of collateral damage in the form of some honest affiliate marketers being trounced right along with the so called &#8216;vagabonds&#8217;, as you put it.</p>
<p>First off, the law isn&#8217;t as explicit as it needs to be.  Also, the fine is not enough to cause the big time scam artists to change any of their marketing tactics.  It will cost many of them a lot more money in lost sales than the $11,000 fine will, if they start marketing honestly all of a sudden.  This is not to condone dishonest marketing, but we all know it is far easier to make a killing if you don&#8217;t have pesky little things like morals, honor and ethics standing in the way.</p>
<p>On the flip side, the $11,000 fine will usually be more than enough to severly cripple, or put out of business altogether, the honest ma and pa affiliate marketers.  </p>
<p>As a result, what you will be left with is a new playground for the affiliate scammers, created specially for them by the FTC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanda</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatetraining.com/?p=3099#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>Nice to read a sensible take on this. I have read so much hype about the FTC&#039;s legislation, so it was a pleasure to read your article.
There is certainly a requirement to get rid of  or try and control unscrupulous online traders.
I agree with both you and Walter that we just have to wait and see how it all pans out and adapt accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to read a sensible take on this. I have read so much hype about the FTC&#8217;s legislation, so it was a pleasure to read your article.<br />
There is certainly a requirement to get rid of  or try and control unscrupulous online traders.<br />
I agree with both you and Walter that we just have to wait and see how it all pans out and adapt accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatetraining.com/?p=3099#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Ditto, ditto, ditto.

The thing is that this time not a lot has actually changed. They&#039;re simply tightening up their legislation because it was totally outdated, but it isn&#039;t going to create a flurry of prosecutions... there&#039;s not a chance in hell of that.

All of the hype and propaganda about it, from people who should really know better, was just scaremongery. That&#039;s it, in a nutshell.

Hope all is well with yourself and Mr Fennell Jr :)

~ Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto, ditto, ditto.</p>
<p>The thing is that this time not a lot has actually changed. They&#8217;re simply tightening up their legislation because it was totally outdated, but it isn&#8217;t going to create a flurry of prosecutions&#8230; there&#8217;s not a chance in hell of that.</p>
<p>All of the hype and propaganda about it, from people who should really know better, was just scaremongery. That&#8217;s it, in a nutshell.</p>
<p>Hope all is well with yourself and Mr Fennell Jr :)</p>
<p>~ Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatetraining.com/?p=3099#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree Walter. A lot of people jumped on the bandwagon there with all of that &quot;affiliate marketing is dead&quot; nonsense, just to get visitors in the door, but like you say all we need to do is evolve, if necessary, and adapt our websites accordingly.

No big deal ;-)

~ Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree Walter. A lot of people jumped on the bandwagon there with all of that &#8220;affiliate marketing is dead&#8221; nonsense, just to get visitors in the door, but like you say all we need to do is evolve, if necessary, and adapt our websites accordingly.</p>
<p>No big deal ;-)</p>
<p>~ Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-1269</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatetraining.com/?p=3099#comment-1269</guid>
		<description>Hey Paul - been following this story for a while. Why is our gov&#039;t so scared (and yours for that matter) to let the market decide?!  Everytime there&#039;s a chance someone could get hurt, they come in to control, when in fact, what happens is TONS MORE people get hurt. B/c good people running fair and honest businesses get slapped with fines and red tape. It hurts the economy, etc....

Good lord, why everyone in this world isn&#039;t a libertarian is truly beyond me. Fraud laws TAKE CARE of this problem already, but i know, lets add MORE bureaucratic nonsense to it to complicate things.  Plus.... the market will decide. Any snake oil salesmen out there will quickly lose their audience if they are in fact liars. It&#039;s like spam on twitter - it tends to take care of itself b/c people just simply stop following. 

Sigh, if we could only leave the market alone! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Paul &#8211; been following this story for a while. Why is our gov&#8217;t so scared (and yours for that matter) to let the market decide?!  Everytime there&#8217;s a chance someone could get hurt, they come in to control, when in fact, what happens is TONS MORE people get hurt. B/c good people running fair and honest businesses get slapped with fines and red tape. It hurts the economy, etc&#8230;.</p>
<p>Good lord, why everyone in this world isn&#8217;t a libertarian is truly beyond me. Fraud laws TAKE CARE of this problem already, but i know, lets add MORE bureaucratic nonsense to it to complicate things.  Plus&#8230;. the market will decide. Any snake oil salesmen out there will quickly lose their audience if they are in fact liars. It&#8217;s like spam on twitter &#8211; it tends to take care of itself b/c people just simply stop following. </p>
<p>Sigh, if we could only leave the market alone! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatetraining.com/?p=3099#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too early to make an assumption about the consequences of FTC&#039;s new ruling. We might as well observe further. Also, I believe that affiliate marketing will evolve with this changes. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too early to make an assumption about the consequences of FTC&#8217;s new ruling. We might as well observe further. Also, I believe that affiliate marketing will evolve with this changes. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatetraining.com/?p=3099#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Thanks Michel. No offence was intended by what I said about you there BTW... I just found it all rather amusing. It seems like a bit of a storm in a tea cup to me. I&#039;ll be very, very surprised if it&#039;s a &quot;game changer&quot; as many people have said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michel. No offence was intended by what I said about you there BTW&#8230; I just found it all rather amusing. It seems like a bit of a storm in a tea cup to me. I&#8217;ll be very, very surprised if it&#8217;s a &#8220;game changer&#8221; as many people have said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel Fortin</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatetraining.com/the-ftc-drop-an-a-bomb-on-internet-affiliates/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel Fortin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatetraining.com/?p=3099#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this. I posted an important update based on recent clarifications made by the FTC...

http://www.michelfortin.com/affiliate-marketing/#update2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this. I posted an important update based on recent clarifications made by the FTC&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.michelfortin.com/affiliate-marketing/#update2" rel="nofollow">http://www.michelfortin.com/affiliate-marketing/#update2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
